Agreement 370

Gepostet von am Sep 9, 2021 in Allgemein | Keine Kommentare

JK is an integral part of India with an agreement, that is, with the President of India. Subsequently, 370 were introduced on provisional basis. Many illegal acts have been committed by Irrlevent elelements on its strength, so it should be immediately withdrawn by order of the president, in order to strengthen the integrity of JK India and the prosperity of the people of this country. All undesirable elements should be removed from the state by force. Waiting is not intended, it is an immediate cation. Article 370 was a lack of foresight on the part of Pandit Nehru, who was influenced by Sheikh Abdulla to write this article in the Constituent Asembly. It was a failure collos of Nehru, who had only dreamed of making an international image. His move was cleverly rejected by then-Justice Minister Baba Saheb Ambedkar, who did not say anything when he said it would be treaserous to sign such an anti-India article. Nehru took advantage of Sardar Patel`s help to convince the Constituent Assembly, which, against its own judgment, decided to save Nehru from the mistrust of the former prime minister in the floor of the house. Nehru lacked foresight not only in his relations with Kashmir, but also in his pancheel agreement with China, which led to the Himalayas` mistake.

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan is no different from his predecessors when it comes to Kashmir policy, as his government uses both bilateral discussions and addresses the issue internationally. However, India`s move to lift the special status of the Kashmir Valley last August, which observers expect will lead to demographic changes in the valley, has been significant. It was the first time that India had taken a unilateral step in defiance of previous agreements, which led to the failure of bilateral talks. 370. All provisions of this Constitution, as amended from time to time, without amendment or exception, shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in Article 152 or Article 308 or any other article of this Constitution or any other provision of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir or any law. Document, judgment, order, order, statute, rule, ordinance, communication, use or use of the law in the territory of India or any other act, convention or arrangement, as provided for in Article 363 or otherwise. Article 370 was also the subject of a temporary agreement between J&K Raja Hari Singh and the Indian government, not with Omar Abdulla. After this agreement, Muslims in the majority of Kahmir looted the homes of the Hindu minority, killed millions of Hindus and occupied their property, many Hindus are fleeing Kashmir. The majority of Muslims have given space to Pakistani terrorists. This is a very, very serious matter.

This Article 370 should therefore definitively withdraw from Jammu and Kashmir As far as I know, the Constitution is a living document, not a frozen or immutable text. It can always be amended by the approval of the majority of States. So why don`t we do it? Is it because India is on the vulnerable ground when it comes to Kashmir? If so, admit it and leave Kashmir. Staying in suspense is like living with a lazy leg that can be treated properly by amputation. So, India, what`s wrong? Can you admit what you do with your rest work? A great nation and great people do not live in dessimulation. What is your long-term plan? Let us hear it, otherwise we will lose the pride of India. According to the Constitution, Article 370 could only be amended with the agreement of the „Land Government“. But in Jammu and Kashmir, there hasn`t been much of a national government for more than a year. I heard the same thing and Nehru is accused of all evils. .